REHOBOTH BEACH FILM FESTIVAL
November 9, 2002

Rob Rector, Board of Directors, Rehoboth Beach Film Society,
Interviews Director Jeff Bemiss for the Newsletter, "The Daily Reel"

 

Q: What was it about the story by Max Lucado that spoke to you and inspired
you to film it?
 
A: I wanted to direct my first film, and was looking for material. I didn't care if it was a short or a feature. I'm not a regular church-goer, but I was invited to church one day by my now wife and in-laws, and the minister related this story as part of the sermon. The twist at the end got me. It made me wonder whether I would have passed Sarah's test. I thought it would be great to make an audience feel that. I was also on the verge of proposing to my high school sweetheart at the time, and I think the depth of love in the story appealed to me.
 
Q: What has the response been since winning the Palm Springs Award?
 
A: Palm Springs was terrific. The festival received over 1,400 submissions, probably every serious short film made in the past year. "The Book and the Rose" placed ninth in the audience choice awards, coming in right behind the 2001 short film Oscar winner. It resulted in some distribution inquiries, including interest from two large PBS markets.
 
Q: Why are festivals such as Rehoboth so important to short film filmmakers?
 
A: There are no other theatrical venues for short films. Festivals like Rehoboth are the only chance filmmakers have to watch their films with an audience, which is how we improve our craft. Also, it's a chance for us to meet each other, and to see each other's work. Rehoboth has programmed several shorts I've been dying to see.
 
Q: What is the biggest struggle for a short film?
 
A: The biggest challenge for a short filmmaker is to use a short film's success to get a feature film off the ground. As a rule, shorts don't get much respect in the film industry. Only a few that manage to build a top notch festival resume---awards at Sundance, Slamdance, Cannes, etc.---create any stir among agents and producers. This can lead to strategic decisions on what kind of short to make. Generally speaking, there is the "festival short," which is clever, fast and funny, and there is the "calling card short," which is longer and more complex. The former gets into more prestigious festivals, but the latter demonstrates ability to handle feature material. The most successful shorts are those that somehow do both.
 
Q: What is next in the works for you?
 
A: I'd love to direct a feature. I started reading a lot of scripts, but became disillusioned when I couldn't find a good fit. As a result, I am working on a couple of screenplays. My standard joke is that I'm the best writer I can afford.

NORTHAMPTON FILM FESTIVAL
November 2, 2001

Excerpt from Audience Question & Answer Session with Director Jeff Bemiss

 

Q: That was an ambitious short film. What kind of challenges did you have making it?
   
A: We shot for seven days, with another three days of pickups. We have some pretty good war stories. One thing that happened was that we found out after finishing principal photography we were missing two and a half days of production sound. A lot of the film is non-verbal, but of course all the dialogue scenes were done during those two and a half days. As a result, more than fifty percent of the film is ADR. Also, the schedule was extremely tight. Too many long days.
   
Q: What was the budget?
   
A: In the neighborhood of $40,000. We had lots of favors and freebies.
   
Q: A question about the scenes in the rain. Did you shoot because of the rain, or in spite of it?
   
A: There are two sequences with rain---one exterior and one interior. We chose rain for the romance of it. For the exterior, the fire department agreed to come out with their pumper truck. They raised the snorkel over the house and made it rain. But they had to aim from a distance to keep it out of the shot, which turned out to be tricky. For the interior, the grips rigged up something that would dribble water over the window continuously. It took a while to shoot that sequence, because there's a time dissolve---we needed it to be dark outside, then light outside. The next morning we found out we'd flooded the downstairs, which was an antique store. Our insurance bought us a ceiling, and some antiques.
   
Q: Talk about the casting. And what was your rehearsal period?
   
A: The three leads---John Barnes, his buddy Seth, and the woman in the green dress---were all LA actors. SAG actors. We got a waiver so we could use them. The rest of the cast we found locally, either in Ft. Wayne, Indianapolis, or Chicago. For some of the bigger scenes where we needed a lot of extras, we had production assistants on the street outside our locations, talking strangers into sparing an hour to come and be an extra. Believe it or not, we got a lot of our background actors that way. In terms of the rehearsal period, it was almost nil. It was a rough shoot, logistically, and I let the rehearsal period get shortchanged. It was mostly confined to the hour prior to shooting, while the set was being lit. It's one of the things I will do differently on the next project.
   
Q: Did you storyboard your film?
   
A: Yes. The D.P. happens to be a pretty good sketch artist, but we ended up using computer software rather than hand-drawn panels. It's neat because you can scan your location photos and use them as backdrops. Of course on the set, we trashed a third of them for the sake of time. But when you've done your homework, you know the best way to consolidate when the crunch comes.
   
Q: What program did you use?
   
A: Storyboard Artist.
   
Q: In the credits you have a list of people with military titles. Were they technical advisors, or are they listed for another reason?
   
A: Both. We shot at a working military base---Camp Atterbury, south of Indianapolis. We chose it because it's an older base and has some vintage barracks buildings. The people there gave us advice on certain period military questions, but we also used them in the cast. One of the sergeants you see drilling the soldiers is actually the colonel of the base. We asked him on the spot to play that part. We gave him a vintage shirt to wear, and scotch-taped some stripes to his sleeve. He looked at them and said, "It's been a while since I've worn Sergeant's stripes..." He was a one-take wonder.
   
Q: How long did it take the lead actor to learn to assemble that gun blindfolded?
   
A: I think two or three hours with an M-1Garand expert in Los Angeles. He also cheated a little. You can see through that blindfold.
   
Q: Was it hard to get permission from the Army?
   
A: For a while, they were neck-and-neck with SAG for the most red tape. But when it was approved, the people at Camp Atterbury bent over backward for us. They enjoyed witnessing the process. One story is that when we wrapped our first day there, the camera department wandered over to another part of the base, where a group of soldiers were doing artillery exercises. Apparently they let our 2nd A.C. fire off the Howitzer. She came back that night beaming and said, "That was THE coolest thing I've ever done in my life." The producer and I just looked at each other, and I know we were thinking the same thing---"We've already had to tell our insurance company we flooded an antique store and blew tires on two equipment trucks---how in the hell would we have explained a Howitzer accident?"
   
Q: What was the price for the use of the short story?
   
A: Max gave it to us for free. The challenge was in convincing him and his people to let us do it at all. It was an incremental process. I had to write the script to get them to say "maybe," then outline the production and potential distribution scenarios to get them to say we could do it. The final part was that Max had to see the finished film to grant his name. Somehow we put it all in a one-page agreement. Max seemed to understand that short films are basically a labor of love, so he was very kind to us.
   
Q: How long was the original story?
   
A: Seven or eight paragraphs. Mainly just that end scene in the train station, with a couple sentences of set-up. We kept the same structure, teasing the ending at the beginning, then playing it out fully at the end. That's already in the short story.
   
Q: Why did you choose this story?
   
A: I was looking for material---either a short or a feature---and was visiting my hometown in Indiana. I went to church with my now wife and in-laws, and the minister related this story in the sermon. The twist at the end got me. It made me question whether I would have passed the test that the hero is put through. I thought it would be great to make an audience feel that.
   
Q: What's the message of the film?
   
A:

It's about how love and beauty fit and don't fit together. For me personally, the message was also to pay attention in church.


Home | Publicity | Articles | Credits